Choose and Manage Healthcare Providers

Market: People who manage their family healthcare

Scenario: A 42-year-old family health manager navigates the complex process of selecting healthcare providers. She searches for potential candidates, evaluates their credentials and availability, and makes informed decisions based on various criteria to ensure high-quality care for her family.

Average Difficulty: Medium (20-30% Range)

11 Outcomes 19% to 35% Difficulty

Research Insights

The research highlights the importance of comprehensive, accurate provider information for Chief Health Officers. Key factors include provider availability, insurance acceptance, and quality ratings. There's a strong emphasis on improving search functionality, increasing filter options, and enhancing visibility of crucial provider details to facilitate informed decision-making.

Job Steps

1. Search for potential providers

2. Evaluate provider options

3. Select a provider

Themes Identified

  • Provider Information Accessibility: Need for improved quality of provider data, increased visibility into insurance acceptance, and comprehensive information about doctors/providers.
  • Search and Filter Optimization: Desire for increased filter options, more providers accepting new patients, and better visibility of appointment availability.
  • Decision Confidence: Importance of increased confidence in finding the right specialist, assurance of providers' medical and interpersonal skills, and clarity about available services at specific facilities.

Recommendations

  • Implement a robust provider data management system to ensure up-to-date and accurate information.
  • Develop an advanced search function with multiple filter options tailored to Chief Health Officers' needs.
  • Create detailed provider profiles that include patient reviews, qualifications, and specialties.
  • Integrate real-time appointment availability and online booking capabilities.
  • Offer a comparison tool for evaluating multiple providers side-by-side.

Cautions

  • Avoid relying on outdated or incomplete provider information.
  • Don't overwhelm users with too many search results without proper filtering options.
  • Refrain from using complex medical jargon that may confuse users during the selection process.
  • Avoid neglecting the importance of provider-patient fit and soft skills in the evaluation process.
  • Don't limit the search functionality to only basic criteria, as Chief Health Officers require comprehensive filtering options.

Outcomes

The difficulty percent below are the percent of the market that finds this outcome difficult to achieve.

Difficulty Outcome
35% Increase visibility of providers appointment availability
28% Increase the number of providers that are taking new patients
26% Increase visibility into the information about the doctor / provider
26% Increase the number of options that are a "good fit" for me
25% Increase confidence that the provider I select has good medical and people skills
25% Increase visibility into whether the doctor (provider) takes my insurance or not
24% Increase clarity that the service I need can be treated at this facility, location
24% Increase my confidence that I found the right type of specialist
22% Increase the number of filter options that match my criteria (close to me, high quality ratings, appointment availability, takes insurance, virtual vs in person)
20% Increase the quality of provider data for search results
19% Increase number of options that are relevant to me and my situation

Sean Gallivan's ridiculously simple signature. Seriously, it is just an X. Why would I put this online anyway? Do I have no fear?
seangallivan@gmail.com

back | top